Run 4 summary

https://query.wikidata.org/querybuilder/

Tested 2026-07-28 02:33:38 using Chrome 150.0.7871.186 (runtime settings)

SummaryWaterfallMetricsRenderingCoachPageXrayCPU

Summary

Google Web Vitals

471 msTTFB
1.240 sLargest Contentful Paint
0.000Cumulative Layout Shift

Loading

1.240 sFirst Paint
1.283 sFully Loaded

Page weight & requests

212.8 KBTotal transfer size
776.2 KBTotal content size
10Requests

CPU

1Long tasks
1.056 sLast long task at

Visual progress

1.233 sFirst Visual Change
1.235 sSpeed Index
1.233 sVisual Complete 85%
1.300 sVisual Complete 99%
1.300 sLast Visual Change
Screenshot
Run 4 · after page complete

Waterfall

First paintFCPLCPDOMContentLoadedDOM interactiveLoadRender-blockingRedirectError

Rendering

Run 4
0.000 s
0s0.5s1s

The red band on the timeline marks when the main thread was busy with long tasks: moments when the page could not paint or respond, however the video looks.

Download video

Filmstrip

4 frames

Use --filmstrip.showAll to show all filmstrips.

Frame at 0 ms
0 ms
0 %
Frame at 1.000 s
1.000 s
0 %
Frame at 1.100 s
1.100 s
0 %
Frame at 1.300 s
1.300 s
100 %

Click a frame to seek the video to that moment. The dot marks frames where the page changed visually.

Visual instability

6.11 % of pixels ever changed · 0 % changed 5+ times
Heatmap of how often each pixel changed while the page loaded

The whole recording in one image: every pixel is tinted by how often it changed. Amber changed once, deep red changed ten or more times. The scale is fixed, so heatmaps from different runs compare directly.

Flat amber is a page that painted once and stayed put. Red speckle in the shape of the text means the same pixels repainted over and over, usually invisible rendering noise that inflates Last Visual Change and Speed Index. A solid red block is a genuinely restless area, like an ad or a carousel.

Frames

How smoothly Chrome delivered frames to the screen during the test. Dropped counts only frames Chrome flags as affecting smoothness. On mostly-static pages the longest gap includes idle time where there was simply nothing to draw.

Frames shown8
Partial0
Dropped0
Effective FPS80
Longest gap37 msat 1.236 s

Why was rendering delayed?

Rendering was not meaningfully delayed. First paint landed at 1.240 s on a 471 ms first byte; the 1 render-blocking request was done by 637 ms and the remaining ~603 ms is style and layout work (74 ms of it measured style recalculation and forced reflows).

Style recalculation

measured by Chrome during this run

Style the browser had to recalculate before it could paint: many elements or a lot of time spent here points at expensive CSS on the critical rendering path. The recalculation count and the largest single one tell the two problems apart: one massive style change touching most of the page (few recalculations, the largest close to the total) needs different medicine than thousands of tiny ones (many recalculations, each tiny).

Style recalculation is not holding up your paint. 26 ms of restyling before the page painted, 2.1 % of the time to First Contentful Paint. Nothing here needs attention.

Before first & largest contentful paint (same paint, 1.240 s)

Recalculations15
Elements429
Total time25.755 ms
Largest recalculation192 elements · 19.939 ms

The recalculation work before first paint is 2.1 % of the time to First Contentful Paint.

Forced reflows before the page painted

measured by Chrome during this run

JavaScript read a layout value (offsetTop, getBoundingClientRect, …) while the page was mid-change, so the browser had to re-layout synchronously, work that blocks rendering. Reflows before First Contentful Paint delayed the first pixels; reflows before Largest Contentful Paint delayed the main content.

Forced reflows before FCP7
Time spent in forced reflows before FCP48.1 ms
Forced reflows before LCP7
Time spent in forced reflows before LCP48.1 ms

That is 3.9 % of the time to Largest Contentful Paint. The number of reflows matters more than the milliseconds: layout thrashing multiplies on slower devices.

  • 25 ms
    Inline or unnamed scriptat 1.203 s
  • 20 ms
    Inline or unnamed scriptat 1.168 s
  • 2 ms
    Inline or unnamed scriptat 1.200 s

See every forced reflow for the whole page load on the CPU tab

Render blocking requests

1 request · 23.8 KB

Blocking requests delay both paints: the browser renders nothing until they arrive, so they push First Contentful Paint and everything after it, including the largest paint (LCP). Requests that block the parser inside the body stall everything after them in the document. Load JavaScript with defer or async, and keep non-critical CSS off the critical path with media attributes. Bars show when each request loaded on a clock that runs to the last paint; the gap after the bars is style and layout work.

RequestWhen it loadedTransferDownload
document
query.wikidata.org · TTFB 471 ms
468 ms
1.9 KB467 ms
css · query.wikidata.org
154 ms
23.8 KB154 ms
0310 ms620 msFCP · LCP 1.240 s

Style invalidations

Why the browser had to recalculate style and layout: every DOM/style change invalidates some set of nodes, and the same class or attribute churning over and over is the pattern to hunt. Counts, not milliseconds: the time is in the style recalculation numbers above.

Most of this is the page being built. Only 22 style recalculations and 16 layout invalidations happened after first paint; the rest is the first render. Not much to chase here.

Style recalculations9222 after first paint
Layout invalidations28816 after first paint

Changes that keep invalidating

top 3
  • pseudo: checked
  • class: cdx-select-vue--value-selected
  • attribute: dir

Invalidation reasons

split at first paint

After first paint

Invalidations on a page the user was already looking at, the actionable half.

ReasonStyle recalculationsLayout
A node was inserted into the page6
An animation updated stylesAnimate transform and opacity so the compositor can run it off the main thread.16
An element entered layout16

Before first paint: building the page

The page being constructed and styled for the first render. Expected work, shown for scale.

ReasonStyle recalculationsLayout
JavaScript changed an inline styleSet a class instead of writing element.style, so the browser can batch the work.32
A node was inserted into the page21
An animation updated stylesAnimate transform and opacity so the compositor can run it off the main thread.8
Related style rule5
A pseudo-class state changed (:hover, :focus, …)2
A stylesheet rule changed1
Attribute1
An element entered layout265
An element left layout3
Scrollbar changed2
An element's size changed1
Unknown1

Scripts causing invalidations

top 1

11 animations run on the main thread instead of on the browser's fast path that animates without blocking other page work (the compositor); they can make the rendering you see above janky. See them on the CPU tab.

Coach

The coach helps you find performance problems on your web page using web performance best practice rules. And gives you advice on privacy and best practices. Tested using Coach-core version 9.2.1.

Performance advice

98
1 warning2 info
infoAdd decoding="async" to non-critical imagesdecodingAsync

The page has 3 images (out of 3) without a decoding hint. Add decoding="async" to non-critical images so the browser can decode them off the main thread.

Setting decoding="async" on an <img> tells the browser it can decode the image off the main thread, which keeps the page responsive to user interactions while images are being processed. The default ("auto") leaves the choice to the browser. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/img#decoding

Offenders
warn(80)Avoid CPU Long TaskslongTasks

The page has 1 CPU long task with the total of 140 ms. The total blocking time is 0 ms and 1 long task before first contentful paint with total time of 140 ms. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. Use Geckoprofiler for Firefox or Chromes tracelog to debug your long tasks.

Long CPU tasks locks the thread. To the user this is commonly visible as a "locked up" page where the browser is unable to respond to user input; this is a major source of bad user experience on the web today. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. To debug you should use the Chrome timeline log and drag/drop it into devtools or use Firefox Geckoprofiler.

Offenders
  • self
infoLong cache headers is goodcacheHeadersLong

The page has 8 requests that have a shorter cache time than one year (but still a cache time).

Setting a cache header is good. Setting a long cache header (a year) is even better because the asset will stay in the browser cache across visits. For content-hashed URLs (e.g. app.4af2.css) you can safely use Cache-Control: max-age=31536000, immutable. For unversioned URLs that may change, use a revalidating strategy instead.

Offenders

Best practice advice

90
3 info
infoMeta descriptionmetaDescription

The page is missing a meta description.

Use a page description to make the page more relevant to search engines.

infoAvoid unnecessary headersunnecessaryHeaders
infoDo not send too long headerslongHeaders

https://query.wikidata.org/favicon.ico has a header content-security-policy-report-only that is 789 characters long.

Do not send response headers that are too long.

Offenders

Privacy advice

74
6 warnings2 info
warn(0)Declare a referrer policy on the documentreferrerPolicy

No <meta name="referrer"> tag was found on the page. Set a Referrer-Policy response header (preferred) or add a meta tag, for example <meta name="referrer" content="strict-origin-when-cross-origin">.

Without an explicit referrer policy the browser falls back to the user-agent default and may leak the full URL of the previous page (including query strings) to every cross-origin request. Set a Referrer-Policy response header (preferred) or a <meta name="referrer"> tag in the document. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Referrer-Policy

warn(0)Use a strict Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.contentSecurityPolicyHeader

Set a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting attacks. You can start with a Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only header, which only reports violations rather than blocking them.

A Content-Security-Policy response header tells the browser which sources of script, style, and other content are allowed. The most effective form is a strict CSP using nonces or hashes together with strict-dynamic; the worst is a missing header, with unsafe-inline and unsafe-eval close behind. https://web.dev/articles/strict-csp

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header so cross-origin subresources opt in to being embedded.crossOriginEmbedderPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header (typically require-corp or credentialless) on the document response to control cross-origin embedding.

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy (COEP) makes the page refuse to load cross-origin subresources unless they explicitly opt in via CORP or CORS. Together with Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.crossOriginOpenerPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header (typically same-origin) on the document response to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy (COOP) lets a page sever its window-group ties to cross-origin documents that opened it or that it opens. Together with Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header to limit who may embed the page.crossOriginResourcePolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header (same-origin, same-site or cross-origin) on the document response to limit who may embed it.

Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy (CORP) is a per-response opt-in that tells the browser which origins are allowed to embed the resource. It blocks cross-origin or cross-site no-cors embedding (img, script, iframe, etc.) and is one of the building blocks of cross-origin isolation. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a Permissions-Policy header to control which browser features the page can use.permissionsPolicyHeader

Set a Permissions-Policy header to control which browser features the page can use.

The Permissions-Policy response header (the successor to Feature-Policy) lets a site explicitly opt in or out of powerful browser features such as camera, microphone, geolocation, payment and clipboard. Setting a strict policy reduces the attack surface and limits what embedded third parties can do. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Permissions-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a referrer-policy header to make sure you do not leak user information.referrerPolicyHeader

Set a referrer-policy header to make sure you do not leak user information.

Referrer Policy is a new header that allows a site to control how much information the browser includes with navigations away from a document and should be set by all sites. https://scotthelme.co.uk/a-new-security-header-referrer-policy/.

Offenders
warn(0)Set X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff to stop the browser from MIME-sniffing the response.xContentTypeOptionsHeader

Set X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff on the document response to prevent MIME-sniffing.

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff prevents browsers from interpreting files as a different MIME type than what is declared in the Content-Type header. This blocks a class of cross-site scripting and content-type confusion attacks and should be set on every response. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/X-Content-Type-Options

Offenders

Page info

A snapshot of what the browser actually built for this page: the document, how big and deep the DOM tree is and what it kept in storage. Big, deep trees are slower to style and lay out, so the counts Chrome warns about carry a flag.

Page info

Document

What the page says it is and how large it rendered.

TitleWikidata Query BuilderThe document title, shown in the browser tab and used by search results.
Layout viewport1904 × 1287 pxThe width the page laid out at, and the full height of the rendered document.

DOM structure

How much markup the browser has to build, style and lay out.

DOM elements959Large, watch layout costTotal HTML elements. Fewer means less for the browser to style, lay out and paint.
Avg DOM depth12How deeply elements are nested on average.
Max DOM depth25Deep treeThe deepest nesting on the page. Deep branches cost more style recalculation.
Iframes0No embedded documents on this page.
Script tags1Number of script elements. More scripts usually means more main-thread work.

Storage and connection

What the page stored on the client, and the network it was tested on.

Local storage0 bData the page saved in localStorage, kept across visits.
Session storage0 bData kept in sessionStorage for this tab session only.
Connection type4GWhat the Network Information API reported for the test connection.

Technologies used to build the page

Data collected using Coach-core version 9.2.1. With updated code from Webappanalyzer 2026-05-04. Use --browsertime.firefox.includeResponseBodies html or --browsertime.chrome.includeResponseBodies html to help Wappalyzer find more information about technologies used.

Detected technologies

3 technologies

Visual Metrics

Visual milestones

all times from navigation start
Speed Index1.24 show quickly the page looked done
First Visual Change1.23 sfirst paint reaches the screen
Last Visual Change1.30 sscreen stops changing · 0.07 s after first
nothing painted yet
First Visual Change · Visual Complete 85% · Visual Complete 95%1.23 s
Visual Complete 99% · Last Visual Change1.30 s
00.3 s0.5 s0.8 s1.0 s
Visual progress
Visual progress at 0 s0.0s
Visual progress at 1 s1.0s
Visual progress at 1.1 s1.1s
Visual progress at 1.3 s1.3s
FCP1.24s
LCP1.24s
VC851.23s
Long tasks
0.0s0.3s0.5s0.8s1.0s1.3s

Google Web Vitals

Largest Contentful Paint

When the page main content is rendered, collected via the Largest Contentful Paint API. Read more about Largest Contentful Paint.

1.240 sLCP render time

Phase breakdown

  • TTFB471 ms
  • Resource load delay0 ms
  • Resource load duration0 ms
  • Element render delay769 ms

Element

Element type
<p>
Size (w × h)
81796
Load time
0 ms
Style recalculation before LCP
15 recalculations touching 429 elements (25.755 ms) — the largest touched 192 elements (19.939 ms)

DOM path

body > div#app > div#app > div > main > p
LCP

The LCP element is highlighted in the screenshot. If nothing is highlighted the element was removed before the screenshot or the LCP API couldn't find it.

Cumulative Layout Shift

How much the page's content shifts as it loads, collected via the Cumulative Layout Shift API.

0.000cumulative layout shift score

No layout shifts were detected on this page.

Browser Metrics

Navigation Timing
Extra timings

Server timings

Timing data the server chose to expose through Server-Timing response headers on the main document — typically backend time, cache status or experiment flags.

Server timings

3 entries
NameDurationDescription
cache0 mspass
host0 mscp3070
co_id0 ms360828044

Custom metrics collected through JavaScript

There are no custom configured scripts.

Extra metrics collected using scripting

There are no custom extra metrics from scripting.

Chrome internal metrics (CDP)33
Audio handlers0
Audio worklet processors0
Documents14
Frames11
JS event listeners851
Layout objects292
Media key sessions0
Media keys0
Nodes2107
Resources10
Context lifecycle state observers27
V8 per context datas3
Worker global scopes0
Uacss resources0
Rtc peer connections0
Resource fetchers14
Ad subframes0
Detached script states2
Array buffer contents0
Layout count3
Recalc style count18
Layout duration25
Recalc style duration27
Dev tools command duration40
Script duration19
V8 compile duration0
Task duration265
Task other duration155
Thread time1
Process time1
JS heap used size6725116
JS heap total size11010048
First meaningful paint1239
Visual Elements2
Heading
Position (x, y)264, 56
Size (w × h)1 × 1
HTML snippet
<h1 class="visually-hidden"></h1>
LargestContentfulPaint
Display time1.233 s
Position (x, y)264, 145
Size (w × h)676 × 130
HTML snippet
<p class="querybuilder__description"></p>

PageXray

How the page is built.

HTTP versionHTTP/2.0
Total requests10
Total domains2
Transfer size212.8 KB
Content size776.2 KB
Missing compression0
Cookies40 third-party

Main document

status 200 · 0 redirects

https://query.wikidata.org/querybuilder/

HeaderValue
accept-rangesbytes
age2
cache-controlno-cache
content-encodinggzip
content-typetext/html
dateTue, 28 Jul 2026 02:33:39 GMT
etagW/"8aa-63a1f22f2d240"
last-modifiedThu, 17 Jul 2025 12:27:45 GMT
nel{ "report_to": "wm_nel", "max_age": 604800, "failure_fraction": 0.05, "success_fraction": 0.0}
report-to{ "group": "wm_nel", "max_age": 604800, "endpoints": [{ "url": "https://intake-logging.wikimedia.org/v1/events?stream=w3c.reportingapi.network_error&schema_uri=/w3c/reportingapi/network_error/1.0.0" }] }
serverApache/2.4.62 (Debian)
server-timingcache;desc="pass", host;desc="cp3070",co_id;desc="360828044"
strict-transport-securitymax-age=106384710; includeSubDomains; preload
varyAccept-Encoding
x-analytics
x-cachecp3070 miss, cp3070 pass
x-cache-statuspass
x-client-ip138.201.135.103
x-request-id37b2ecb2-1d36-42d0-8924-8f328d153841

Response codes

200
990.0%
204
110.0%

Requests and sizes per content type

7 types

Transfer size212.8 KB

  • javascript79.7%
  • css11.2%
  • svg3.4%
  • favicon3.1%
  • json1.4%
  • html0.91%
  • plain0.39%

Content size776.2 KB

  • javascript67.5%
  • css28.1%
  • favicon1.9%
  • svg1.2%
  • json0.95%
  • html0.28%

Requests10

  • svg40.0%
  • html10.0%
  • css10.0%
  • javascript10.0%
  • favicon10.0%
  • json10.0%
  • plain10.0%
ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b1.9 KB2.2 KB1
css0 b23.8 KB218.3 KB1
javascript0 b169.5 KB524.2 KB1
favicon0 b6.5 KB14.7 KB1
json0 b2.9 KB7.4 KB1
plain0 b842 B0 b1
svg0 b7.2 KB9.4 KB4
Total0 b212.8 KB776.2 KB10

Data per domain

2 domains
DomainTotal download timeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
query.wikidata.org2.004 s211.9 KB776.2 KB9
www.wikidata.org184 ms842 B0 b1

Expires & last-modified statistics

typeminmedianmax
Expires0 seconds1 hour1 hour
Last modified16 hours1 year1 year

Requests loaded after onLoad event

7 requests

Includes requests done after load event end.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html0 b0
css0 b0
javascript0 b0
image0 b0
font0 b0
favicon6.5 KB1
json2.9 KB1
plain842 B1
svg7.2 KB4
Total17.5 KB7

Requests loaded after onContentLoad

7 requests

Includes requests done after DOM content loaded.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html0 b0
css0 b0
javascript0 b0
image0 b0
font0 b0
favicon6.5 KB1
json2.9 KB1
plain842 B1
svg7.2 KB4
Total17.5 KB7

CPU

Long tasks

Tasks ≥ 50 ms blocking the main thread, collected via the Long Task API.

TBT0 ms
Max potential input delay0 ms
Total long tasks1
Total time140 ms
Last task at1.056 s
Before first paint140 ms1 task
Before FCP140 ms1 task
Before LCP140 ms1 task
After load140 ms1 task

Long Animation Frames

A long animation frame (LOAF) is a frame that took ≥ 50 ms from input to the next paint. The part beyond the threshold is blocking time, the number that hurts Interaction to Next Paint and Total Blocking Time. Break long tasks up (scheduler.yield(), smaller chunks) or move the work off the main thread. Read more about the Long Animation Frames API.

Long animation frames2every frame ≥ 50 ms
Blocking time92.5 msacross all long frames — what hurts INP and TBT
Forced style & layout47.8 msscripts reading layout mid-frame
Blocking before LCP92.5 msdelaying the largest paint — fix these first
Blocking after load92.5 msafter the load event — didn't delay page load

What to fix first

ScriptFramesTime runningBlocking (share by run time)Forced style & layoutTriggered by
index.97f88779.js1140.7 ms92.2 ms47.8 mspromise callback

A frame's blocking time is split between its scripts by their share of the frame's work, capped at each script's own run time — blocking from work no script owns (HTML parsing, browser internals) stays unattributed. The per-script blocking view below uses the same attribution.

Long animation frame #1 · 142.9 msat 1.056 s · before LCP
blocking 92.5 ms
  • Scripts & other work141.2 ms
  • Animation callbacks1.2 ms
  • Style & layout0.5 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame · forced style & layout 47.8 ms
Ran for
140.7 ms
Forced style and layout
47.8 ms
Started by
Response.json.then
How it started
promise callback
Position in source
character 122456 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)

1 more long frame carried no blocking time (nothing ran past the 50 ms threshold) — long, but harmless to INP and TBT.

Blocking time per script (browser-reported)

How much each script blocked the main thread, derived from the Long Animation Frame API. Each frame's blocking time is split between its scripts by their share of the frame's work, capped at each script's own run time — blocking from work no script owns (HTML parsing, browser internals) is not attributed (older data credits the script that started the frame). The closest answer to "which script should I fix to improve TBT" the platform exposes.

Top scripts blocking the main thread

1 of 1 script

Blocking time per script (trace)

Total Blocking Time attributed per script from the Chrome trace: every main-thread task longer than 50 ms blocks input for the remainder, and each blocking task is credited to the script whose own code ran the longest during that task.

TBT91.1 ms
Blocking tasks1
TBT before LCP91.1 ms1 task

What kind of work blocked

mostly running javascript · 91 ms total
Running JavaScript53.8 ms59.1%
Style & layout31.1 ms34.1%
Parsing HTML & CSS4.1 ms4.5%
Garbage collection1.9 ms2.1%
Other browser work0.2 ms0.2%
Running JavaScript (59%): the scripts responsible are listed right below. See Slowest JS functions
Style & layout (34%): usually a large DOM, expensive CSS selectors or JavaScript forcing synchronous layout. See Forced reflows · Forced layout per script · Style invalidations (Rendering tab)

Top scripts blocking the main thread

1 of 1 script

Where the time went

All main-thread work during the full page load, not just the share that blocked input. Calculated from the Chrome trace.

Categories

256 ms total
Running JavaScript127 ms49.6%
Style & layout53 ms20.7%
Other browser work (scheduling)44 ms17.2%
Parsing HTML & CSS14 ms5.5%
Paint & composite8 ms3.1%
Garbage collection8 ms3.1%
Parsing & compiling JavaScript2 ms0.8%
What do these categories mean?
Parsing HTML & CSSparseHTML
Reading the HTML and CSS and building the page structure. Grows with document size — a big server-rendered page costs more here.
Style & layoutstyleLayout
Working out which CSS rules apply and where every element goes on the page. Grows with DOM size and selector complexity.
Parsing & compiling JavaScriptscriptParseCompile
Parsing and compiling JavaScript before it can run — the cost of shipping bytes of JS, even unused ones.
Running JavaScriptscriptEvaluation
Running JavaScript: event handlers, timers, promise callbacks and script execution.
Paint & compositepaintCompositeRender
Painting pixels and assembling layers into the frames you see on screen.
Garbage collectiongarbageCollection
Reclaiming memory JavaScript no longer uses. A lot of it means allocation-heavy code.
Other browser work (scheduling)other
Chrome’s own task management: per-task overhead and thousands of sub-millisecond scheduler ticks — not page work you can attribute or optimize away. On this page 44 ms of it is this per-task bookkeeping (RunTask self time in the trace).

Slowest JS functions

The functions where main-thread JavaScript time was actually spent, sampled by Chrome's JavaScript profiler. Self time is spent in the function itself; total time includes the functions it called. For loader/dispatcher functions whose total dwarfs their self time, the runs line shows the top functions and modules (up to five, ≥ 1 ms) the total was actually spent running.

Functions by self time

15 of 19 functions
FunctionWhereSelf timeTotal time
Tphttps://query.wikidata.org/querybuilder/assets/index.97f88779.js25.6 ms25.9 ms
Yyhttps://query.wikidata.org/querybuilder/assets/index.97f88779.js20.3 ms20.3 ms
Td
runs: N1 (1.5 ms)
https://query.wikidata.org/querybuilder/assets/index.97f88779.js9.3 ms10.8 ms
(anonymous)
runs: (anonymous) (1.7 ms)
https://query.wikidata.org/querybuilder/assets/index.97f88779.js6.5 ms12.5 ms
Ss
runs: runIfDirty (71.0 ms), x (20.9 ms), (anonymous) (4.8 ms), S (1.1 ms)
https://query.wikidata.org/querybuilder/assets/index.97f88779.js3.6 ms100.8 ms
Gl
runs: (anonymous) (5.3 ms), Lw (3.2 ms), Qb (1.7 ms), hv (1.6 ms)
https://query.wikidata.org/querybuilder/assets/index.97f88779.js3.4 ms26.4 ms
I3
runs: Td (10.8 ms), C3 (2.8 ms)
https://query.wikidata.org/querybuilder/assets/index.97f88779.js2.2 ms18.7 ms
setAttributeBrowser internal (not your code)2.2 ms2.2 ms
updatedhttps://query.wikidata.org/querybuilder/assets/index.97f88779.js2.2 ms2.2 ms
insertBeforeBrowser internal (not your code)1.7 ms1.7 ms
N1https://query.wikidata.org/querybuilder/assets/index.97f88779.js1.5 ms1.5 ms
Cchttps://query.wikidata.org/querybuilder/assets/index.97f88779.js1.4 ms2.2 ms
get
runs: get (4.9 ms)
https://query.wikidata.org/querybuilder/assets/index.97f88779.js1.3 ms7.2 ms
M
runs: $ (502.7 ms), I3 (18.3 ms), insert (1.6 ms), createElement (1.5 ms)
https://query.wikidata.org/querybuilder/assets/index.97f88779.js1.3 ms61.4 ms
B6https://query.wikidata.org/querybuilder/assets/index.97f88779.js1.3 ms1.4 ms

Forced reflows

A forced reflow happens when JavaScript reads a layout-triggering property (offsetTop, getBoundingClientRect, …) inside a handler, forcing the browser to synchronously recompute layout. The scripts below caused most of the page's reflows. Fix them in priority order.

Scripts causing reflows

2 reflows ≥ 2 ms across 1 script
Inline or unnamed script
45 ms · 2 reflows · worst 25 ms

Forced layout per script

Each long animation frame reports how much time each script spent forcing synchronous style and layout, i.e. JavaScript reading layout-triggering properties mid-execution. Same actionable answer as forced reflows above but measured directly by the browser instead of inferred from the trace.

Scripts forcing layout

1 of 1 script

First vs third party CPU time

Main-thread CPU time from the Chrome trace split by domain. First party is wikidata.org.

First party2 ms
Third party0 ms

Non-composited animations

Animations that fell back from the compositor to the main thread, blocking each frame instead of running on the GPU.

Each chip below is a CSS property the page tried to animate that Chrome couldn't hand to the compositor. Swap it for a transform or opacity equivalent where you can.

Properties to fix

6 properties · 11 animations
  • border-bottom-color
  • border-left-color
  • border-right-color
  • border-top-color
  • color
  • box-shadow

Want to dig deeper? Download the Chrome trace and drag-and-drop it into Performance in DevTools.