Page summary

login

Tested 2026-08-24 20:21:39 using Chrome 151.0.7922.75 (script).(runtime settings)

Test mobile as a logged in user

Login the user with an empty browser cache, then visit Obama and Facebook

SummaryWaterfallMetricsRenderingCoachPageXrayCPU

This page is visually stable, but slow to paint, janky to interact with, loose on best practices, weak on user privacy and slow to respond from the server.

75 / 100
Coach overall
69 / 100
Performance
88 / 100
Best practice
79 / 100
Privacy

How it loaded →

0 → 13.934 s · median run
Frame at 0 ms
start
Frame at 4200 ms
Largest paint4.200 s
Frame at 5000 ms
5.000 s
Frame at 7400 ms
7.400 s
Frame at 10600 ms
10.600 s
Frame at 14000 ms
Complete14.000 s
4.267 s
First Visual Change
4.726 s
Speed Index
4.267 s
Visual Complete 85%
13.934 s
Last Visual Change
TTFB2.002 sLCP3.232 sTBT835 msCLS0.00

What to act on · top recommendations

Have a fast first contentful paint

0 / 100

First contentful paint is poor (3.232 s). It is in the Google Web Vitals poor range, slower than 3 seconds.The page has a high time to first byte (TTFB) 2.002 s that you should look into to improve first contentful paint.

Avoid CPU Long Tasks

0 / 100

The page has 7 CPU long tasks with the total of 1.185 s. The total blocking time is 835 ms . However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. Use Geckoprofiler for Firefox or Chromes tracelog to debug your long tasks.

Serve images in modern formats (AVIF, WebP)

0 / 100

The page ships 17 images (out of 17) in JPEG/PNG/GIF without a modern alternative. Wrap them in a <picture> with a <source type="image/avif"> or "image/webp" before the legacy <img>, or serve modern formats from your image pipeline directly. AVIF and WebP usually deliver 25–50% smaller files at the same quality.

Google Web Vitals

min · median · mean · max of 1 run
MetricMinMedianMeanMax
Time To First Byte (TTFB)2.002 s2.002 s2.002 s2.002 s
Largest Contentful Paint (LCP)3.232 s3.232 s3.232 s3.232 s
Cumulative Layout Shift (CLS)0000

Visual Metrics

min · median · mean · max of 1 run
MetricMinMedianMeanMax
First visual change4.267 s4.267 s4.267 s4.267 s
Last visual change13.934 s13.934 s13.934 s13.934 s
Speed index4.726 s4.726 s4.726 s4.726 s
Largest image4.267 s4.267 s4.267 s4.267 s
Heading4.267 s4.267 s4.267 s4.267 s
Largest contentful paint4.267 s4.267 s4.267 s4.267 s
Last meaningful paint4.267 s4.267 s4.267 s4.267 s
Visual readiness9.667 s9.667 s9.667 s9.667 s
Visual complete 854.267 s4.267 s4.267 s4.267 s
Visual complete 954.267 s4.267 s4.267 s4.267 s
Visual complete 9913.334 s13.334 s13.334 s13.334 s

CPU

min · median · mean · max of 1 run
MetricMinMedianMeanMax
Total Blocking Time835 ms835 ms835 ms835 ms
Max Potential FID321 ms321 ms321 ms321 ms
CPU long tasks 7777
CPU last long task happens at5.636 s5.636 s5.636 s5.636 s

More metrics

min · median · mean · max of 1 run
MetricMinMedianMeanMax
First paint3.232 s3.232 s3.232 s3.232 s
Load event end7.280 s7.280 s7.280 s7.280 s

User Timing

min · median · mean · max of 1 run
MetricMinMedianMeanMax
mwStartup2.530 s2.530 s2.530 s2.530 s

Waterfall

Run 1 SpeedIndex median

First paintFCPLCPDOMContentLoadedDOM interactiveLoadRender-blockingRedirectError

Rendering

Run 1 · median
0.000 s
0s2s4s6s8s10s12s14s

The red band on the timeline marks when the main thread was busy with long tasks: moments when the page could not paint or respond, however the video looks.

Download video

Filmstrip

25 frames

Use --filmstrip.showAll to show all filmstrips.

Frame at 0 ms
0 ms
0 %
Frame at 2.600 s
2.600 s
0 %
Frame at 3.300 s
3.300 s
0 %
Frame at 3.600 s
3.600 s
0 %
Frame at 3.900 s
3.900 s
0 %
Frame at 4.200 s
4.200 s
0 %
Frame at 4.300 s
4.300 s
95 %
Frame at 4.500 s
4.500 s
95 %
Frame at 4.600 s
4.600 s
95 %
Frame at 4.900 s
4.900 s
95 %
Frame at 5.000 s
5.000 s
95 %
Frame at 5.300 s
5.300 s
95 %
Frame at 5.700 s
5.700 s
95 %
Frame at 7.300 s
7.300 s
95 %
Frame at 7.400 s
7.400 s
95 %
Frame at 7.600 s
7.600 s
95 %
Frame at 7.900 s
7.900 s
95 %
Frame at 8.200 s
8.200 s
95 %
Frame at 10.400 s
10.400 s
95 %
Frame at 10.600 s
10.600 s
95 %
Frame at 10.800 s
10.800 s
95 %
Frame at 11.100 s
11.100 s
95 %
Frame at 13.400 s
13.400 s
99 %
Frame at 13.600 s
13.600 s
99 %
Frame at 14.000 s
14.000 s
100 %

Click a frame to seek the video to that moment. The dot marks frames where the page changed visually.

Visual instability

60.05 % of pixels ever changed · 0.27 % changed 5+ times
Heatmap of how often each pixel changed while the page loaded

The whole recording in one image: every pixel is tinted by how often it changed. Amber changed once, deep red changed ten or more times. The scale is fixed, so heatmaps from different runs compare directly.

Flat amber is a page that painted once and stayed put. Red speckle in the shape of the text means the same pixels repainted over and over, usually invisible rendering noise that inflates Last Visual Change and Speed Index. A solid red block is a genuinely restless area, like an ad or a carousel.

Frames

How smoothly Chrome delivered frames to the screen during the test. Dropped counts only frames Chrome flags as affecting smoothness. On mostly-static pages the longest gap includes idle time where there was simply nothing to draw.

Frames shown437
Partial25
Dropped13
Effective FPS43.5
Longest gap751 msat 2.226 s

Why was rendering delayed?

The server dominated the wait. The first byte took 2.002 s (62 % of the time to First Contentful Paint). Nothing can render before it arrives, and Google Web Vitals considers a TTFB over 800 ms in need of improvement. See the request timing on the Waterfall tab. First paint landed at 3.232 s; the 3 render-blocking requests were done by 2.657 s and the remaining ~575 ms is style and layout work (221 ms of it measured style recalculation and forced reflows).

Style recalculation

measured by Chrome during this run

Style the browser had to recalculate before it could paint: many elements or a lot of time spent here points at expensive CSS on the critical rendering path. The recalculation count and the largest single one tell the two problems apart: one massive style change touching most of the page (few recalculations, the largest close to the total) needs different medicine than thousands of tiny ones (many recalculations, each tiny).

One large recalculation dominates. Restyling 1 086 elements cost 202 ms before the page painted (6.2 % of the time to First Contentful Paint), and a single recalculation of 1 074 elements accounts for 197 ms of it. Look for one class or inline-style change on a large container near the top of the DOM that restyles the whole subtree at once. The changes driving it are listed under Style invalidations below.

Before first & largest contentful paint (same paint, 3.232 s)

Recalculations6
Elements1086
Total time201.918 ms
Largest recalculation1074 elements · 196.718 ms

The recalculation work before first paint is 6.2 % of the time to First Contentful Paint.

Forced reflows before the page painted

measured by Chrome during this run

JavaScript read a layout value (offsetTop, getBoundingClientRect, …) while the page was mid-change, so the browser had to re-layout synchronously, work that blocks rendering. Reflows before First Contentful Paint delayed the first pixels; reflows before Largest Contentful Paint delayed the main content.

Forced reflows before FCP3
Time spent in forced reflows before FCP19.1 ms
Forced reflows before LCP3
Time spent in forced reflows before LCP19.1 ms

That is 0.6 % of the time to Largest Contentful Paint. The number of reflows matters more than the milliseconds: layout thrashing multiplies on slower devices.

See every forced reflow for the whole page load on the CPU tab

Render blocking requests

4 requests · 53.7 KB

Blocking requests delay both paints: the browser renders nothing until they arrive, so they push First Contentful Paint and everything after it, including the largest paint (LCP). Requests that block the parser inside the body stall everything after them in the document. Load JavaScript with defer or async, and keep non-critical CSS off the critical path with media attributes. Bars show when each request loaded on a clock that runs to the last paint; the gap after the bars is style and layout work.

RequestWhen it loadedTransferDownload
document
en.wikipedia.org · TTFB 2.002 s
2.430 s
55.6 KB974 ms
ext.echo.styles.alert + 16 more modulesblocking
css · load.php styles batch · en.wikipedia.org
317 ms
27.8 KB317 ms
user.stylesblocking
css · load.php styles batch · en.wikipedia.org
150 ms
1.0 KB150 ms
site.stylesblocking
css · load.php styles batch · en.wikipedia.org
145 ms
2.9 KB145 ms
startuppotentially blocking
javascript · load.php startup · en.wikipedia.org
141 ms
21.9 KB141 ms
0808 ms1.616 sFCP · LCP 3.232 s

Slowest CSS selectorsProfile run

How long Chrome spent testing each CSS selector against the page while recalculating styles. A selector with many match attempts and zero matches is evaluated against the document over and over for rules that never apply.

Not worth optimizing on this page. All selector matching cost 113 ms under the 7× CPU throttle, roughly 16 ms real time, and the worst single selector 4.05 ms. The tables are kept for reference.

Matching time113 ms
Match attempts186 029
Matches8 887
Show the selector tables anyway

Selectors by matching time

top 25
SelectorTimeAttemptsMatches
a:where(:not([role="button"]):not(.cdx-menu-item__content)):visited4.05 ms1 146534
blockquote > :last-child2.74 ms2 3930
a:where(:not([role="button"]):not(.cdx-menu-item__content)):visited:hover2.57 ms1 1460
.mw-parser-output #sister-projects-list li span2.56 ms42954
html.skin-theme-clientpref-night .navbox a:not(.new):not(.mw-selflink):link2.56 ms1 1460
ul.hlist li2.15 ms66132
a:where(:not([role="button"]):not(.cdx-menu-item__content)):visited:active2.10 ms1 1460
ol:lang(azb) > li1.79 ms6610
.mw-parser-output a[rel~="mw:ExtLink"]:empty::after1.76 ms4560
.client-js .outercollapse .innercollapse.mw-collapsible:not(.mw-made-collapsible) > :is(p, table, thead + tbody)1.75 ms2 3930

Wasted selector work: attempts that never match

top 25
SelectorAttemptsTime
blockquote > :first-child2 3931.59 ms
blockquote > :last-child2 3932.74 ms
.skin-theme-clientpref-night .ns-100 .mw-parser-output :not(.notheme):not(a)2 3931.48 ms
.client-js .outercollapse .innercollapse.mw-collapsible:not(.mw-made-collapsible) :is(tr:not(:first-child), .mw-collapsible-content)2 3931.20 ms
blockquote > :only-child2 3930.95 ms
.content .center > *2 3930.09 ms
.client-js .outercollapse .innercollapse.mw-collapsible:not(.mw-made-collapsible) > :is(p, table, thead + tbody)2 3931.75 ms
.cdx-dialog__body > :last-child1 2350.04 ms
.cdx-dialog__body > :first-child1 2350.07 ms
.overlay-header h2 > *1 2130.08 ms

Style invalidationsProfile run

Why the browser had to recalculate style and layout: every DOM/style change invalidates some set of nodes, and the same class or attribute churning over and over is the pattern to hunt. Counts, not milliseconds: the time is in the style recalculation numbers above.

Chase what keeps changing after the page is up. 170 style recalculations and 218 layout invalidations fired after first paint, on a page the user was already looking at. The biggest driver is pseudo disabled (4×). Start with the script under "Scripts causing invalidations" that keeps triggering it.

Style recalculations180170 after first paint
Layout invalidations2 009218 after first paint

Changes that keep invalidating

top 10
  • pseudo: disabled
  • pseudo: enabled
  • attribute: class
  • attribute: title
  • attribute: disabled
  • pseudo: last-child
  • pseudo: only-child
  • class: content
  • class: touch-events
  • class: minerva-animations-ready

Invalidation reasons

split at first paint

After first paint

Invalidations on a page the user was already looking at, the actionable half.

ReasonStyle recalculationsLayout
A node was inserted into the page64
An animation updated stylesAnimate transform and opacity so the compositor can run it off the main thread.44
Related style rule28
A stylesheet rule changed23
An @keyframes rule changed11
An element entered layout194
Unknown6
An element's size changed7
A style change forced layout7
An element left layout3
An SVG element changed1

Before first paint: building the page

The page being constructed and styled for the first render. Expected work, shown for scale.

ReasonStyle recalculationsLayout
A node was inserted into the page9
A stylesheet rule changed1
An element entered layout1 785
Unknown4
An element's size changed2

Scripts causing invalidations

top 6

3 animations run on the main thread instead of on the browser's fast path that animates without blocking other page work (the compositor); they can make the rendering you see above janky. See them on the CPU tab.

Coach

The coach helps you find performance problems on your web page using web performance best practice rules. And gives you advice on privacy and best practices. Tested using Coach-core version 9.2.1.

What to fix first

Performance advice

69
2 errors12 warnings3 info
error(0)Have a fast first contentful paintfirstContentfulPaint

First contentful paint is poor (3.232 s). It is in the Google Web Vitals poor range, slower than 3 seconds.The page has a high time to first byte (TTFB) 2.002 s that you should look into to improve first contentful paint.

The First Contentful Paint (FCP) metric measures the time from when the page starts loading to when any part of the page content is rendered on the screen. For this metric, "content" refers to text, images (including background images), <svg> elements, or non-white <canvas> elements.

warn(0)Avoid CPU Long TaskslongTasks

The page has 7 CPU long tasks with the total of 1.185 s. The total blocking time is 835 ms . However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. Use Geckoprofiler for Firefox or Chromes tracelog to debug your long tasks.

Long CPU tasks locks the thread. To the user this is commonly visible as a "locked up" page where the browser is unable to respond to user input; this is a major source of bad user experience on the web today. However the CPU Long Task is depending on the computer/phones actual CPU speed, so you should measure this on the same type of the device that your user is using. To debug you should use the Chrome timeline log and drag/drop it into devtools or use Firefox Geckoprofiler.

Offenders
  • self
  • self
  • self
  • self
  • self
  • self
  • self
warn(0)Serve images in modern formats (AVIF, WebP)modernImageFormats

The page ships 17 images (out of 17) in JPEG/PNG/GIF without a modern alternative. Wrap them in a <picture> with a <source type="image/avif"> or "image/webp" before the legacy <img>, or serve modern formats from your image pipeline directly. AVIF and WebP usually deliver 25–50% smaller files at the same quality.

AVIF and WebP routinely deliver 25–50% smaller files than JPEG and PNG at the same perceived quality, and every browser version still under support understands at least one of them. Ship modern formats either through a <picture> element with <source type="image/avif"> / "image/webp" entries in front of the legacy <img>, or directly from a content-negotiating image pipeline that returns AVIF / WebP when the client accepts it. https://web.dev/articles/serve-images-webp

Offenders
warn(0)Avoid doing redirectsassetsRedirects

The page has 67 redirects. 2 of the redirects are from the base domain, please fix them! 65 requests are from other domains, it could be 3rd-party assets doing unnecessary redirects. :(

A redirect is one extra step for the user to download the asset. Avoid that if you want to be fast. Redirects are even more of a showstopper on mobile.

Offenders
warn(0)Avoid extra requests by setting cache headerscacheHeaders

The page has 83 requests that are missing a cache time. Configure a cache time so the browser doesn't need to download them every time. It will save 254 kB the next access.

The easiest way to make your page fast is to avoid doing requests to the server. Setting a cache header on your server response will tell the browser that it doesn't need to download the asset again during the configured cache time! Always try to set a cache time if the content doesn't change for every request.

Offenders
warn(0)Avoid redirecting the main documentdocumentRedirect

The main document gets redirected 3 time(s). Remove those redirect and make the page faster!

You should never ever redirect the main document, because it will make the page load slower for the user. Well, you should redirect the user if the user tries to use HTTP and there's an HTTPS version of the page. The coach checks for that. :)

Offenders
warn(0)Total JavaScript size shouldn't be too bigjavascriptSize

The total JavaScript transfer size is 411.9 kB and the uncompressed size is 1.9 MB. This is totally crazy! There is really room for improvement here.

A lot of JavaScript often means you are downloading more than you need. How complex is the page and what can the user do on the page? Do you use multiple JavaScript frameworks?

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/load.php?lang=en&modules=startup&only=scripts&raw=1&skin=minerva21.9 KB66.5 KB
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/load.php...ia.org/w/load.php1.6 KB1.5 KB
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/load.php...ia.org/w/load.php9.3 KB26.9 KB
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/load.php...ia.org/w/load.php242.1 KB1006.8 KB
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/load.php?lang=en&modules=user&skin=minerva&user=Wptuser&version=uoaiv1.3 KB777 B
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/load.php...ia.org/w/load.php125.9 KB769.4 KB
warn(0)Don't use private headers on static contentprivateAssets

The page has 60 requests with private headers. The main page has a private header. It could be right in some cases where the user can be logged in and served specific content. But if your asset is static it should never be private. Make sure that the assets really should be private and only used by one user. Otherwise, make it cacheable for everyone.

If you set private headers on content, that means that the content are specific for that user. Static content should be able to be cached and used by everyone. Avoid setting the cache header to private.

Offenders
infoAdd decoding="async" to non-critical imagesdecodingAsync

The page has 20 images (out of 37) without a decoding hint. Add decoding="async" to non-critical images so the browser can decode them off the main thread.

Setting decoding="async" on an <img> tells the browser it can decode the image off the main thread, which keeps the page responsive to user interactions while images are being processed. The default ("auto") leaves the choice to the browser. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/img#decoding

Offenders
warn(53)Lazy-load below-the-fold imageslazyLoadingImages

The page has 17 below-the-fold images without loading="lazy". Add loading="lazy" so the browser defers downloading and decoding them until the user scrolls them into view.

Adding loading="lazy" to an <img> tells the browser not to download or decode it until it is close to the viewport. For images that the user may never see (deep in the page, behind a tab, in a footer carousel), this saves bandwidth and main-thread time during initial render. The LCP image and any image in the initial viewport should NOT be lazy-loaded — that delays the first paint. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/img#loading

Offenders
infoLong cache headers is goodcacheHeadersLong

The page has 22 requests that have a shorter cache time than one year (but still a cache time).

Setting a cache header is good. Setting a long cache header (a year) is even better because the asset will stay in the browser cache across visits. For content-hashed URLs (e.g. app.4af2.css) you can safely use Cache-Control: max-age=31536000, immutable. For unversioned URLs that may change, use a revalidating strategy instead.

Offenders
warn(80)Don't scale images in the browseravoidScalingImages

The page has 2 images that are scaled more than 100 pixels. It would be better if those images are sent so the browser don't need to scale them.

It's easy to scale images in the browser and make sure they look good in different devices, however that is bad for performance! Scaling images in the browser takes extra CPU time and will hurt performance on mobile. And the user will download extra kilobytes (sometimes megabytes) of data that could be avoided. Don't do that, make sure you create multiple version of the same image server-side and serve the appropriate one.

Offenders
error(80)Have a fast largest contentful paintlargestContentfulPaint

Largest contentful paint can be improved 3.232 s. It is in the Google Web Vitals needs improvement range, slower than 2.5 seconds.

Largest contentful paint is one of Google Web Vitals and reports the render time of the largest image or text block visible within the viewport, relative to when the page first started loading. To be fast according to Google, it needs to render before 2.5 seconds and results over 4 seconds is poor performance.

Offenders
  • <div class="cdx-message__content"></div>
warn(90)Always compress text contentcompressAssets

The page has 1 request that are served uncompressed. You could save a lot of bytes by sending them compressed instead.

In the early days of the Internet there were browsers that didn't support compressing (gzipping) text content. They do now. Make sure you compress HTML, JSON, JavaScript, CSS and SVG. It will save bytes for the user; making the page load faster and use less bandwith.

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page55.6 KB247.4 KB
infoMake each CSS response smalloptimalCssSize

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/load.php?lang=en&modules=ext.echo.styles.alert%2Cbadge%7Cext.personalDashboard.menuIcon%7Cext.wikimediamessages.styles%7Cmediawiki.codex.messagebox.styles%7Cmediawiki.hlist%7Cmediawiki.skinning.content.parsoid%7Cmediawiki.skins.legacy%7Cmobile.init.styles%7Coojs-ui.styles.icons-alerts%7Cskins.minerva.codex.styles%7Cskins.minerva.content.styles.images%7Cskins.minerva.icons%2Cstyles%7Cskins.minerva.loggedin.styles%7Cskins.minerva.mainPage.styles%7Cwikibase.client.init&only=styles&skin=minerva size is 28.5 kB (28505) and that is bigger than the limit of 25 kB. Try to keep each CSS response under 25 kB.

Render-blocking CSS holds up the first paint until it has fully downloaded, parsed and applied, so smaller CSS files mean a faster start. Split your CSS into a small critical bundle inlined or eagerly loaded, with the rest lazy-loaded.

Offenders
URLTransferContent
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/load.php...ia.org/w/load.php27.8 KB234.6 KB
warn(95)Inline CSS for faster first renderinlineCss

The page has both inline CSS and CSS requests even though it uses a HTTP/2-ish connection. If you have many users on slow connections, it can be better to only inline the CSS. Run your own tests and check the waterfall graph to see what happens.

In the early days of the Internet, inlining CSS was one of the ugliest things you can do. That has changed if you want your page to start rendering fast for your user. Always inline the critical CSS when you use HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 (avoid doing CSS requests that block rendering) and lazy load and cache the rest of the CSS. It is a little more complicated when using HTTP/2. Does your server support HTTP push? Then maybe that can help. Do you have a lot of users on a slow connection and are serving large chunks of HTML? Then it could be better to use the inline technique, becasue some servers always prioritize HTML content over CSS so the user needs to download the HTML first, before the CSS is downloaded.

warn(99)Avoid slowing down the critical rendering pathavoidRenderBlocking

The page has 3 blocking requests and 0 in body parser blocking (0 JavaScript and 3 CSS). There are 1 potentially render blocking requests. You need to verify if it is render blocking: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/load.php?lang=en&modules=startup&only=scripts&raw=1&skin=minerva

The critical rendering path is what the browser needs to do to start rendering the page. Every file requested inside of the head element will postpone the rendering of the page, because the browser need to do the request. Avoid loading JavaScript synchronously inside of the head (you should not need JavaScript to render the page), request files from the same domain as the main document (to avoid DNS lookups) and inline CSS for really fast rendering and a short rendering path.

Offenders

Best practice advice

88
3 info
infoMeta descriptionmetaDescription

The page is missing a meta description.

Use a page description to make the page more relevant to search engines.

infoAvoid unnecessary headersunnecessaryHeaders

There are 77 responses that sets both a max-age and expires header. There are 113 responses that sets a server header.

Do not send headers that you don't need. We look for p3p, cache-control and max-age, pragma, server and x-frame-options headers. Have a look at Andrew Betts - Headers for Hackers talk as a guide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k92ZbrY815c or read https://www.fastly.com/blog/headers-we-dont-want.

Offenders
infoDo not send too long headerslongHeaders

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page has a header set-cookie that is 2103 characters long. https://en.wikipedia...ia.org/w/load.php has a header sourcemap that is 1397 characters long.

Do not send response headers that are too long.

Offenders

Privacy advice

79
4 warnings2 info
warn(0)Use a strict Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.contentSecurityPolicyHeader

Set a Content-Security-Policy header to mitigate cross-site scripting attacks. You can start with a Content-Security-Policy-Report-Only header, which only reports violations rather than blocking them.

A Content-Security-Policy response header tells the browser which sources of script, style, and other content are allowed. The most effective form is a strict CSP using nonces or hashes together with strict-dynamic; the worst is a missing header, with unsafe-inline and unsafe-eval close behind. https://web.dev/articles/strict-csp

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header so cross-origin subresources opt in to being embedded.crossOriginEmbedderPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header (typically require-corp or credentialless) on the document response to control cross-origin embedding.

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy (COEP) makes the page refuse to load cross-origin subresources unless they explicitly opt in via CORP or CORS. Together with Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.crossOriginOpenerPolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header (typically same-origin) on the document response to isolate the page from cross-origin windows.

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy (COOP) lets a page sever its window-group ties to cross-origin documents that opened it or that it opens. Together with Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy it puts the page in a cross-origin isolated context, which mitigates cross-window side-channel attacks (Spectre) and unlocks high-resolution timers and SharedArrayBuffer. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy

Offenders
infoSet a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header to limit who may embed the page.crossOriginResourcePolicyHeader

Set a Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy header (same-origin, same-site or cross-origin) on the document response to limit who may embed it.

Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy (CORP) is a per-response opt-in that tells the browser which origins are allowed to embed the resource. It blocks cross-origin or cross-site no-cors embedding (img, script, iframe, etc.) and is one of the building blocks of cross-origin isolation. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a Permissions-Policy header to control which browser features the page can use.permissionsPolicyHeader

Set a Permissions-Policy header to control which browser features the page can use.

The Permissions-Policy response header (the successor to Feature-Policy) lets a site explicitly opt in or out of powerful browser features such as camera, microphone, geolocation, payment and clipboard. Setting a strict policy reduces the attack surface and limits what embedded third parties can do. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Permissions-Policy

Offenders
warn(0)Set a referrer-policy header to make sure you do not leak user information.referrerPolicyHeader

Set a referrer-policy header to make sure you do not leak user information.

Referrer Policy is a new header that allows a site to control how much information the browser includes with navigations away from a document and should be set by all sites. https://scotthelme.co.uk/a-new-security-header-referrer-policy/.

Offenders

Page info

A snapshot of what the browser actually built for this page: the document, how big and deep the DOM tree is and what it kept in storage. Big, deep trees are slower to style and lay out, so the counts Chrome warns about carry a flag.

Page info

Document

What the page says it is and how large it rendered.

TitleWikipedia, the free encyclopediaThe document title, shown in the browser tab and used by search results.
GeneratorMediaWiki 1.47.0-wmf.16The tool or CMS that generated the HTML, from the page generator meta tag.
Layout viewport360 × 9329 pxThe width the page laid out at, and the full height of the rendered document.

DOM structure

How much markup the browser has to build, style and lay out.

DOM elements2,155Very large, slows layout and styleTotal HTML elements. Fewer means less for the browser to style, lay out and paint.
Avg DOM depth12How deeply elements are nested on average.
Max DOM depth20The deepest nesting on the page. Deep branches cost more style recalculation.
Iframes0No embedded documents on this page.
Script tags7Number of script elements. More scripts usually means more main-thread work.

Storage and connection

What the page stored on the client, and the network it was tested on.

Local storage1.5 MBData the page saved in localStorage, kept across visits.
Session storage0 bData kept in sessionStorage for this tab session only.
Connection type4GWhat the Network Information API reported for the test connection.

Resource hints

2 hints
dns-prefetch
  • https://meta.wikimedia.org/
preconnect
  • https://upload.wikimedia.org/

Technologies used to build the page

Data collected using Coach-core version 9.2.1. With updated code from Webappanalyzer 2026-05-04. Use --browsertime.firefox.includeResponseBodies html or --browsertime.chrome.includeResponseBodies html to help Wappalyzer find more information about technologies used.

Detected technologies

4 technologies

Data from run 1

Visual Metrics

Visual milestones

all times from navigation start
Speed Index4.73 show quickly the page looked done
First Visual Change4.27 sfirst paint reaches the screen
Last Visual Change13.93 sscreen stops changing · 9.67 s after first
nothing painted yet
≥95% rendered
First Visual Change · Visual Complete 85% · Visual Complete 95%4.27 s
Visual Complete 99%13.33 s
Last Visual Change13.93 s
Visual Readiness9.67 s· first to last change
02.5 s5.0 s7.5 s10.0 s12.5 s
Visual progress
Visual progress at 0 s0.0s
Visual progress at 3.6 s3.6s
Visual progress at 4.5 s4.5s
Visual progress at 5 s5.0s
Visual progress at 7.4 s7.4s
Visual progress at 8.2 s8.2s
Visual progress at 11.1 s11.1s
Visual progress at 14 s14.0s
FCP3.23s
LCP3.23s
VC854.27s
Long tasks
0.0s2.8s5.6s8.4s11.2s14.0s

Google Web Vitals

from run 1
2.002 sTTFB
Poor
3.232 sLCP
Needs improvement
835 msTBT
Poor

Largest Contentful Paint

When the page main content is rendered, collected via the Largest Contentful Paint API. Read more about Largest Contentful Paint.

3.232 sLCP render time

Phase breakdown

  • TTFB2.002 s
  • Resource load delay0 ms
  • Resource load duration0 ms
  • Element render delay1.230 s

Element

Element type
<div>
Size (w × h)
52592
Load time
0 ms
Style recalculation before LCP
6 recalculations touching 1086 elements (201.918 ms) — the largest touched 1074 elements (196.718 ms)

DOM path

body > div#mw-mf-viewport > div#mw-mf-page-center > main#content > div:eq(0) > div#siteNotice > div:eq(1) > div
LCP

The LCP element is highlighted in the screenshot. If nothing is highlighted the element was removed before the screenshot or the LCP API couldn't find it.

Cumulative Layout Shift

How much the page's content shifts as it loads, collected via the Cumulative Layout Shift API.

0.000cumulative layout shift score

No layout shifts were detected on this page.

Browser Metrics

Navigation Timing
Extra timings
TTFB2.002 s
User Timing marks
mwStartup2.530 s

Server timings

Timing data the server chose to expose through Server-Timing response headers on the main document — typically backend time, cache status or experiment flags.

Server timings

3 entries
NameDurationDescription
cache0 mspass
host0 mscp3070
co_id0 ms1157451243

Custom metrics collected through JavaScript

There are no custom configured scripts.

Extra metrics collected using scripting

There are no custom extra metrics from scripting.

Visual Elements3
LargestImagewikipedia-wordmark-en-25.svg
Display time4.267 s
Position (x, y)53, 16
Size (w × h)140 × 22
HTML snippet
<img src="/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-wordmark-en-25.svg" alt="Wikipedia" width="140" height="22" style="width: 8.75em; height: 1.375em;">
LargestImage preview
Heading
Display time4.267 s
Position (x, y)16, 283
Size (w × h)328 × 37
HTML snippet
<h1 id="firstHeading" class="firstHeading mw-first-heading"></h1>
LargestContentfulPaint
Display time4.267 s
Position (x, y)41, 68
Size (w × h)306 × 182
HTML snippet
<div class="cdx-message__content"></div>

PageXray

How the page is built.

HTTP versionHTTP/2.0
Total requests113
Total domains19
Transfer size764.2 KB
Content size2.5 MB
Missing compression1
Cookies1911 third-party

Main document

status 200 · 3 redirects

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

HeaderValue
accept-chSec-CH-UA, Sec-CH-UA-Arch, Sec-CH-UA-Bitness, Sec-CH-UA-Form-Factor, Sec-CH-UA-Full-Version-List, Sec-CH-UA-Mobile, Sec-CH-UA-Model, Sec-CH-UA-Platform, Sec-CH-UA-Platform-Version, Sec-CH-UA-WoW64
age0
cache-controlprivate, max-age=0, s-maxage=0
content-length0
content-typetext/html; charset=UTF-8
dateMon, 24 Aug 2026 20:21:42 GMT
expiresThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 GMT
locationhttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:UserLogin/return&returnto=Main+Page&wpLoginToken=7b0f59f874f57e3686b9d995123129b66a8ca7c6%2B%5C&useformat=mobile&usesul3=1&centralauthLoginToken=ceb8dd1216d4539c2a35565f9982b4a5
nel{ "report_to": "wm_nel", "max_age": 604800, "failure_fraction": 0.05, "success_fraction": 0.0}
report-to{ "group": "wm_nel", "max_age": 604800, "endpoints": [{ "url": "https://intake-logging.wikimedia.org/v1/events?stream=w3c.reportingapi.network_error&schema_uri=/w3c/reportingapi/network_error/1.0.0" }] }
servermw-web.eqiad.main-788c78f66d-hrk89
server-timingcache;desc="pass", host;desc="cp3070",co_id;desc="1694790465"
strict-transport-securitymax-age=106384710; includeSubDomains; preload
varyAccept-Encoding,X-Forwarded-Proto,Cookie,Authorization
x-analytics
x-cachecp3070 miss, cp3070 pass
x-cache-statuspass
x-client-ip138.201.135.103
x-content-type-optionsnosniff
x-request-idc005be9e-c778-40d4-a49e-ac3b47e57e28

Response codes

200
4338.1%
202
32.7%
302
6759.3%

Requests and sizes per content type

8 types

Transfer size764.2 KB

  • javascript52.6%
  • image32.7%
  • html7.3%
  • css4.2%
  • svg2.4%
  • plain0.34%
  • json0.24%
  • favicon0.24%

Content size2.5 MB

  • javascript72.4%
  • html9.6%
  • css9.4%
  • image8.0%
  • svg0.53%
  • favicon0.10%
  • json0.01%

Requests46

  • image39.1%
  • svg28.3%
  • javascript13.0%
  • css6.5%
  • plain6.5%
  • html2.2%
  • favicon2.2%
  • json2.2%
ContentHeader SizeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
html0 b55.6 KB247.4 KB1
css0 b31.8 KB241.6 KB3
javascript0 b402.2 KB1.8 MB6
image0 b250.1 KB206.3 KB18
favicon0 b1.8 KB2.7 KB1
svg0 b18.2 KB13.6 KB13
json0 b1.8 KB288 B1
plain0 b2.6 KB0 b3
Total0 b764.2 KB2.5 MB46

Data per domain

19 domains
DomainTotal download timeTransfer SizeContent SizeRequests
auth.wikimedia.org10.638 sN/A0 b33
en.wikipedia.org7.314 s516.1 KB2.3 MB31
en.wikibooks.org811 ms3.0 KB68 B3
en.wikinews.org729 ms3.0 KB68 B3
en.wikiquote.org964 ms3.0 KB68 B3
en.wikisource.org781 ms3.0 KB68 B3
en.wikiversity.org1.087 s3.0 KB68 B3
en.wikivoyage.org1.818 s3.0 KB68 B3
en.wiktionary.org769 ms3.0 KB68 B3
www.mediawiki.org792 ms3.0 KB68 B3
commons.wikimedia.org779 ms2.8 KB68 B3
foundation.wikimedia.org734 ms1.2 KB68 B3
incubator.wikimedia.org1.189 s2.8 KB68 B3
meta.wikimedia.org772 ms2.8 KB68 B3
species.wikimedia.org844 ms2.8 KB68 B3
wikimania.wikimedia.org918 ms1.2 KB68 B3
www.wikidata.org1.227 s2.9 KB68 B3
www.wikifunctions.org2.205 s1.4 KB68 B3
upload.wikimedia.org541 ms205.8 KB203.9 KB1

Expires & last-modified statistics

typeminmedianmax
Expires0 seconds0 seconds1 year
Last modified4 days7 weeks7 weeks

Requests loaded after onLoad event

2 requests

Includes requests done after load event end.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html0 b0
css0 b0
javascript0 b0
image2.1 KB1
font0 b0
favicon1.8 KB1
Total3.9 KB2

Requests loaded after onContentLoad

37 requests

Includes requests done after DOM content loaded.

ContentTransfer SizeRequests
html0 b0
css0 b0
javascript125.9 KB1
image228.0 KB10
font0 b0
favicon1.8 KB1
Total355.6 KB37

CoverageProfile run

JavaScript and CSS coverage from the extra profile run made by --enableProfileRun, not from the timed iterations. For JS, Chrome tracks which blocks of each script actually ran: a byte is unused when the innermost block of code around it never ran. For CSS, Chrome records every selector that no element on the page matched during the iteration. Enable with --chrome.coverage on every run, or --enableProfileRun to keep the main run's timing metrics untouched. Unused bytes still cost network, parse and compile time for no benefit. Expand the section below for the full picture.

How is "unused" calculated?

sitespeed.io drives Chrome's V8 profiler and CSS rule tracker via the DevTools Protocol, the same machinery the DevTools Coverage panel uses. The two columns are populated by two different mechanisms.

JavaScript

Browsertime calls Profiler.startPreciseCoverage with detailed (block-level) mode at the start of the iteration and Profiler.takePreciseCoverage at the end. V8 returns nested ranges per function: an outer range covering the function body and inner ranges for sub-blocks (if/else, switch arms, ternaries). Each range has an execution count. A byte is "used" if the innermost range that covers it has count > 0, "unused" if it has count = 0, so we catch both functions that never ran AND dead branches inside functions that did.

CSS

Browsertime calls CSS.startRuleUsageTracking at the start of the iteration and CSS.stopRuleUsageTracking at the end. Chrome returns a flat list of rule-text ranges with a used flag: a rule is "used" if at least one element on the page matched it during the iteration. Both inline <style> blocks and external stylesheets are included.

What "this iteration" means

Coverage reflects only what executed during this run. Code behind a button click stays unused unless the iteration clicked the button. The collection window opens before navigation and closes when measure.stop() is reached, so the only way to count interactions is to drive them between measure.start() and measure.stop() inside a navigation script (pass a .js file as the input instead of a plain URL). Clicks, form fills and waits placed there all count toward "used". --preScript runs before the URL is loaded so it can't interact with the page being measured, and --postScript runs after coverage has already been collected, so neither helps here. Detailed coverage also tells V8 to skip some optimisations, which drifts timing metrics like LCP and TBT; that's why --enableProfileRun is the safer option for production measurement (it collects coverage in a separate iteration that doesn't count towards the medians).

JS total1.8 MB
JS unused824.8 KB
JS unused %43.9%
CSS total444.4 KB
CSS unused390.3 KB
CSS unused %87.8%

Where the bytes go

16 files · tile size is total bytes, tint is unused share

2.3 MB of script and style shipped, and 1.2 MB of it never ran on this page. The biggest win is load.php[scripts:ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLogger]: 1003.2 KB delivered, 452.9 KB unused, and inside it jquery alone ships 86.6 KB of dead code.

load.php[scripts:ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLogger]1003.2 KB · 45% unused
load.php[scripts:ext.echo.dm]769.4 KB · 44% unused
load.php[styles:ext.echo.styles.alert]234.6 KB · 84% unused
inline193.9 KB · 94% unused
load.php[startup]66.5 KB · 9% unused
load.php[scripts:ext.visualEditor.core.utils.parsing]26.9 KB · 87% unused
load.php[scripts:ext.gadget.geonotice]1.5 KB · 77% unused
load.php[scripts:user]777 B · 0% unused
8 more files26.5 KB · 42% unused
Unused shareunder 40%40 to 70%over 70%Click a bundle marked ⤢ to see its modules.

Where the unused bytes live

first-party regex .*wikimedia.*
JS unused
First 453.7 KBThird 371.1 KB
CSS unused
First 383.9 KBThird 6.4 KB

JavaScript files

showing 7 of 7 URLs (from 11 scripts), sorted by unused bytes
URLTotalUsedUnusedUnused %
load.php[scripts:ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLogger]1003.2 KB550.3 KB452.9 KB
45.1%
71 modules in this bundle, by unused bytes
ModuleVersionTotalUsedUnusedUnused %
jquery16rou137.4 KB50.8 KB86.6 KB
63.0%
ext.wikimediaEvents1qtlt55.9 KB19.4 KB36.5 KB
65.3%
mobile.startup13dpe65.7 KB40.7 KB25.0 KB
38.0%
mediawiki.apiz5im027.1 KB4.9 KB22.2 KB
82.0%
ext.uls.interfaceljhqu47.5 KB25.5 KB22.0 KB
46.4%
ext.centralNotice.display1jgtq30.5 KB9.5 KB20.9 KB
68.7%
skins.minerva.scriptsng4zt57.6 KB38.4 KB19.2 KB
33.3%
mobile.init4vvs118.8 KB6.2 KB12.6 KB
66.8%
ext.growthExperiments.SuggestedEditSession19elm15.8 KB3.7 KB12.1 KB
76.6%
mediawiki.util15zox16.4 KB5.1 KB11.4 KB
69.1%
oojs1797x15.0 KB3.7 KB11.3 KB
75.4%
mediawiki.template.mustache1niba12.1 KB1.6 KB10.5 KB
86.5%
mediawiki.jqueryMsgarc6u29.8 KB19.4 KB10.4 KB
34.9%
mediawiki.page.readysfwx016.7 KB7.0 KB9.7 KB
58.1%
ext.navigationTiming18ja510.8 KB1.5 KB9.3 KB
86.2%
ext.echo.api8hx8e11.9 KB2.8 KB9.2 KB
76.8%
mediawiki.DateFormattergv7yr13.2 KB4.2 KB9.0 KB
68.4%
ext.testKitchen1rj0w29.2 KB20.6 KB8.6 KB
29.3%
mmv.bootstrapt8men26.9 KB19.3 KB7.6 KB
28.3%
mediawiki.page.watch.ajax126um8.8 KB1.8 KB7.0 KB
79.3%
mediawiki.language11hcb8.7 KB1.7 KB7.0 KB
80.6%
ext.echo.init1mxnw6.7 KB652 B6.1 KB
90.5%
ext.centralNotice.kvStore1ggbc6.8 KB1.1 KB5.7 KB
83.6%
jquery.textSelection16q5k5.8 KB287 B5.6 KB
95.2%
ext.eventLogging.metricsPlatformadrwj14.6 KB9.2 KB5.4 KB
37.2%
mediawiki.Title11zzw10.2 KB6.0 KB4.2 KB
41.0%
ext.wikimediaEvents.testKitchen165zf4.6 KB785 B3.9 KB
83.4%
ext.centralauth.ForeignApi1myki4.6 KB776 B3.8 KB
83.5%
mediawiki.basej9mks28.5 KB24.6 KB3.8 KB
13.4%
jquery.uls.data15mhg43.2 KB39.4 KB3.8 KB
8.8%
mediawiki.libs.pluralruleparser1utt83.6 KB197 B3.4 KB
94.7%
ext.eventLogging1jxo228.0 KB24.6 KB3.4 KB
12.1%
mw.cx.SiteMapper1fopq4.3 KB1.0 KB3.3 KB
76.6%
ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLoggert5uro4.0 KB807 B3.2 KB
80.1%
ext.urlShortener.toolbar1dk5r3.8 KB1.1 KB2.7 KB
70.9%
mediawiki.user1lcpm4.2 KB1.7 KB2.4 KB
58.3%
ext.checkUser.clientHints7tpv03.0 KB635 B2.4 KB
79.3%
ext.centralNotice.impressionDiet2jcqc2.7 KB446 B2.3 KB
83.9%
mediawiki.String1xixe2.4 KB543 B1.9 KB
78.0%
ext.centralNotice.largeBannerLimit1tsy72.2 KB479 B1.8 KB
78.9%
ext.cx.entrypoints.languagesearcher.v21uczy3.1 KB1.6 KB1.6 KB
50.4%
mediawiki.routerx9r1o2.4 KB907 B1.5 KB
63.4%
jquery.client1n4yo3.3 KB1.8 KB1.5 KB
44.9%
ext.uls.webfonts198622.0 KB663 B1.4 KB
67.8%
mediawiki.ForeignApi.corepb72f2.2 KB863 B1.3 KB
61.1%
mediawiki.template1blsn1.5 KB359 B1.2 KB
77.4%
ext.centralNotice.startUp1ipzh2.7 KB1.5 KB1.1 KB
42.4%
mediawiki.visibleTimeoutehbob1.5 KB434 B1.1 KB
71.5%
mediawiki.cookieq6bh03.2 KB2.3 KB892 B
27.6%
mediawiki.storagednxpi2.9 KB2.1 KB890 B
29.6%
ext.centralNotice.geoIP1g16w1.5 KB850 B698 B
45.1%
ext.uls.rewrite.entrypoints1peyz1.8 KB1.2 KB607 B
32.7%
mw.externalguidance.initxfoyw1.4 KB880 B542 B
38.1%
ext.uls.preferences17lrh1.1 KB667 B423 B
38.8%
ext.parsermigration.reportbug.init19wzm3.4 KB3.1 KB314 B
9.1%
ext.popups1ayph735 B486 B249 B
33.9%
ext.centralNotice.legacySupport1qdcf453 B254 B199 B
43.9%
mediawiki.cldr13x6e350 B153 B197 B
56.3%
ext.cx.eventlogging.campaigns48624347 B187 B160 B
46.1%
ext.wikimediaEvents.emailConfirmationBannerlxc5v768 B672 B96 B
12.5%
ext.centralauth.centralautologin.clearcookie5zfqh531 B436 B95 B
17.9%
wikibase.databox.fromWikidatalwf59709 B640 B69 B
9.7%
mediawiki.experiments1jfeg780 B756 B24 B
3.1%
ext.personalDashboard.blueDot19zge1.8 KB1.8 KB21 B
1.1%
ext.centralNotice.choiceData1yl508.6 KB8.6 KB4 B
0.0%
ext.cx.model1wwuh224 B224 B0 b
0.0%
site7t1rt2.1 KB2.1 KB0 b
0.0%
mediawiki.ForeignApirqcii72 B72 B0 b
0.0%
mediawiki.pulsatingdot1gsjp694 B694 B0 b
0.0%
mmv.codexf380r70.8 KB70.8 KB0 b
0.0%
mobile.codex.styles1frpm41.3 KB41.3 KB0 b
0.0%
load.php[scripts:ext.echo.dm]769.4 KB428.9 KB340.5 KB
44.3%
17 modules in this bundle, by unused bytes
ModuleVersionTotalUsedUnusedUnused %
oojs-ui-corenwn0a186.8 KB35.8 KB151.0 KB
80.8%
moment1qfpy97.2 KB24.1 KB73.1 KB
75.2%
oojs-ui-widgets1d6rj92.1 KB36.3 KB55.8 KB
60.6%
ext.echo.uip1rlb64.9 KB24.8 KB40.1 KB
61.8%
ext.echo.dm1159c24.8 KB8.9 KB15.9 KB
64.1%
ext.echo.mobile1bytq7.7 KB3.1 KB4.7 KB
60.3%
ext.echo.secondaryicons5f4zv2.4 KB2.4 KB0 b
0.0%
oojs-ui-core.iconsxli3i13.3 KB13.3 KB0 b
0.0%
oojs-ui-core.styles1q8cn81.3 KB81.3 KB0 b
0.0%
oojs-ui-widgets.icons9h6o76.3 KB6.3 KB0 b
0.0%
oojs-ui.styles.icons-content1yi3141.9 KB41.9 KB0 b
0.0%
oojs-ui.styles.icons-editing-core1xcuh14.1 KB14.1 KB0 b
0.0%
oojs-ui.styles.icons-interactions1gjyd61.2 KB61.2 KB0 b
0.0%
oojs-ui.styles.icons-moderation1j3oq21.9 KB21.9 KB0 b
0.0%
oojs-ui.styles.icons-movementq3fbg22.3 KB22.3 KB0 b
0.0%
oojs-ui.styles.icons-user1m0m828.1 KB28.1 KB0 b
0.0%
oojs-ui.styles.indicators16qqm3.1 KB3.1 KB0 b
0.0%
load.php[scripts:ext.visualEditor.core.utils.parsing]26.9 KB3.5 KB23.4 KB
86.9%
4 modules in this bundle, by unused bytes
ModuleVersionTotalUsedUnusedUnused %
ext.visualEditor.targetLoaderde2wa23.0 KB2.4 KB20.6 KB
89.4%
ext.visualEditor.core.utils.parsingipi2f3.3 KB800 B2.5 KB
76.5%
ext.visualEditor.vepoyn0303 B124 B179 B
59.1%
ext.visualEditor.track14ulv295 B192 B103 B
34.9%
load.php[startup]66.5 KB60.5 KB6.0 KB
9.1%
load.php[scripts:ext.gadget.geonotice]1.5 KB355 B1.2 KB
77.1%
2 modules in this bundle, by unused bytes
ModuleVersionTotalUsedUnusedUnused %
ext.gadget.switcherneci01.3 KB190 B1.1 KB
85.8%
ext.gadget.geonotice1dr37211 B165 B46 B
21.8%
(inline) 5 scripts10.6 KB9.7 KB835 B
7.7%
load.php[scripts:user]777 B777 B0 b
0.0%
1 module in this bundle, by unused bytes
ModuleVersionTotalUsedUnusedUnused %
user7awen777 B777 B0 b
0.0%

CSS files

showing 9 of 9 URLs (from 11 stylesheets), sorted by unused bytes
URLTotalUsedUnusedUnused %
load.php[styles:ext.echo.styles.alert]234.6 KB36.4 KB198.2 KB
84.5%
(inline stylesheet) 3 stylesheets193.9 KB12.1 KB181.8 KB
93.7%
load.php[styles:site.styles]6.5 KB62 B6.4 KB
99.1%
TemplateStyles:r13434151315.3 KB2.3 KB2.9 KB
55.7%
TemplateStyles:r13218027881.1 KB572 B516 B
47.4%
TemplateStyles:r13331330642.3 KB1.8 KB480 B
20.5%
TemplateStyles:r1126788409205 B205 B0 b
0.0%
TemplateStyles:r1299347567574 B574 B0 b
0.0%
TemplateStyles:r105337875474 B74 B0 b
0.0%

What to do about unused bytes

one iteration is a sample, not a verdict

A high unused-% on one run means this iteration loaded code that didn't get exercised, typical on first-load journeys before any user interaction. Drive the real flow by passing a navigation script as the input instead of a plain URL, with clicks and form fills placed between measure.start() and measure.stop(); anything in that window counts toward "used". The advice below is for code that's still unused after a representative run.

JavaScript

  • Route-split and lazy-load below-the-fold features with dynamic import(). Bundlers turn the import boundary into a separate chunk.
  • Audit big bundles for dead exports, legacy polyfills, and feature flags that no longer ship; most modern bundlers tree-shake but only when imports are precise.
  • Question third-party scripts. Tag managers, analytics SDKs and A/B test loaders often ship far more than the page uses and dominate the third-party column above.
  • Move non-critical scripts to defer or async so the parser doesn't block on code the page doesn't need yet.

CSS

  • Strip selectors no shipped HTML matches: PurgeCSS, build-time scoping in your component framework, or your CSS-in-JS extractor.
  • Drop legacy browser fallbacks if your target floor has moved (vendor prefixes, IE hacks, old flexbox syntax).
  • Split route- or component-specific CSS so the home page doesn't carry the checkout's styles.
  • Inline the critical-path CSS (above-the-fold) and lazy-load the rest with media= tricks or rel="preload" swaps.

CPU

load.php[startup] is responsible for 92% of blocking time
849 ms of 925 ms total. Defer it, replace it with a lighter alternative, or move its work off the main thread to recover most of your TBT.

Long tasks

Tasks ≥ 50 ms blocking the main thread, collected via the Long Task API.

TBT835 ms
Max potential input delay321 ms
Total long tasks7
Total time1.185 s
Last task at5.636 s
Before first paint0 ms0 tasks
Before FCP0 ms0 tasks
Before LCP0 ms0 tasks
After load0 ms0 tasks

Long Animation Frames

A long animation frame (LOAF) is a frame that took ≥ 50 ms from input to the next paint. The part beyond the threshold is blocking time, the number that hurts Interaction to Next Paint and Total Blocking Time. Break long tasks up (scheduler.yield(), smaller chunks) or move the work off the main thread. Read more about the Long Animation Frames API.

Long animation frames12showing the 10 with the most blocking time
Blocking time1.405 sacross all long frames — what hurts INP and TBT
Forced style & layout2.8 msscripts reading layout mid-frame
Blocking before LCP467.9 msdelaying the largest paint — fix these first

What to fix first

ScriptFramesTime runningBlocking (share by run time)Forced style & layoutTriggered by
load.php[startup]71.026 s848.6 msscript tag, timer or animation callback
load.php[scripts:ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLogger]4153.7 ms70 ms2.8 msscript tag, event handler, timer or animation callback
inline script in the document17.3 ms5.9 msscript tag

A frame's blocking time is split between its scripts by their share of the frame's work, capped at each script's own run time — blocking from work no script owns (HTML parsing, browser internals) stays unattributed. The per-script blocking view below uses the same attribution.

Long animation frame #1 · 1.045 sat 2.122 s · before LCP
blocking 467.9 ms
  • Scripts & other work575.6 ms
  • Animation callbacks0.1 ms
  • Style & layout469 ms
  • Render0 ms
2 scripts ran during this frame
Ran for
7.3 ms
Queued before running
3.1 ms
How it started
script tag
Ran for
48.8 ms
How it started
script tag
Long animation frame #2 · 542 msat 3.469 s · before load
blocking 391.8 ms
  • Scripts & other work421.7 ms
  • Animation callbacks66.9 ms
  • Style & layout53.4 ms
  • Render0 ms
3 scripts ran during this frame
Ran for
45.7 ms
Queued before running
10.3 ms
How it started
script tag
Ran for
321.5 ms
Started by
IdleRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
doPropagation
Position in source
character 4301 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Ran for
66.9 ms
Started by
FrameRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
flushCssBuffer
Position in source
character 3227 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Long animation frame #3 · 252.2 msat 5.636 s · before load
blocking 202.2 ms
  • Scripts & other work252.2 ms
  • Animation callbacks0 ms
  • Style & layout0 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame
Ran for
252.1 ms
Started by
IdleRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
flushWrites
Position in source
character 19327 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Long animation frame #4 · 230.4 msat 4.262 s · before load
blocking 164.6 ms
  • Scripts & other work36.5 ms
  • Animation callbacks114.9 ms
  • Style & layout79 ms
  • Render0 ms
3 scripts ran during this frame
Ran for
8.3 ms
Started by
IdleRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
doPropagation
Position in source
character 4301 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Ran for
7.2 ms
Started by
#document.onDOMContentLoaded
How it started
event handler
Source function
completed
Position in source
character 367266 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Ran for
113.6 ms
Started by
FrameRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
flushCssBuffer
Position in source
character 3227 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Long animation frame #5 · 156.2 msat 4.084 s · before load
blocking 68.2 ms
  • Scripts & other work67.9 ms
  • Animation callbacks57.8 ms
  • Style & layout30.5 ms
  • Render0 ms
2 scripts ran during this frame
Ran for
29.7 ms
Started by
IdleRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
doPropagation
Position in source
character 4301 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Ran for
56.5 ms
Started by
FrameRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
flushCssBuffer
Position in source
character 3227 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Long animation frame #6 · 111.2 msat 4.884 s · before load
blocking 50.9 ms
  • Scripts & other work45 ms
  • Animation callbacks46 ms
  • Style & layout20.2 ms
  • Render0 ms
2 scripts ran during this frame
Ran for
34.6 ms
Started by
IdleRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
doPropagation
Position in source
character 4301 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Ran for
45.2 ms
Started by
FrameRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
flushCssBuffer
Position in source
character 3227 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Long animation frame #7 · 186 msat 4.504 s · before load
blocking 43.8 ms
  • Scripts & other work181.8 ms
  • Animation callbacks0 ms
  • Style & layout4.2 ms
  • Render0 ms
1 script ran during this frame · forced style & layout 2.8 ms
Ran for
89.5 ms
Forced style and layout
2.8 ms
Started by
TimerHandler:setTimeout
How it started
timer or animation callback
Position in source
character 364423 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Long animation frame #8 · 74 msat 5.005 s · before load
blocking 15.2 ms
  • Scripts & other work41.7 ms
  • Animation callbacks16.3 ms
  • Style & layout16 ms
  • Render0 ms
2 scripts ran during this frame
Ran for
33 ms
Started by
IdleRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
doPropagation
Position in source
character 4301 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)
Ran for
16.3 ms
Started by
FrameRequestCallback
How it started
timer or animation callback
Source function
flushCssBuffer
Position in source
character 3227 into the file (locate it via DevTools → Performance → the Long Animation Frames track)

2 more long frames carried no blocking time (nothing ran past the 50 ms threshold) — long, but harmless to INP and TBT.

Blocking time per script (browser-reported)

How much each script blocked the main thread, derived from the Long Animation Frame API. Each frame's blocking time is split between its scripts by their share of the frame's work, capped at each script's own run time — blocking from work no script owns (HTML parsing, browser internals) is not attributed (older data credits the script that started the frame). The closest answer to "which script should I fix to improve TBT" the platform exposes.

Top scripts blocking the main thread

3 of 3 scripts
load.php[startup]
849 ms · 12 frames · worst 290 ms
inline script in the document
6 ms · 1 frame · worst 6 ms

Blocking time per script (trace)

Total Blocking Time attributed per script from the Chrome trace: every main-thread task longer than 50 ms blocks input for the remainder, and each blocking task is credited to the script whose own code ran the longest during that task.

TBT1.352 s
Blocking tasks11
TBT before LCP506.6 ms3 tasks

What kind of work blocked

mostly running javascript · 1.352 s total
Running JavaScript676.7 ms50.0%
Style & layout514.0 ms38.0%
Other browser work63.9 ms4.7%
Paint & composite55.3 ms4.1%
Parsing HTML & CSS23.9 ms1.8%
Garbage collection12.3 ms0.9%
Parsing & compiling JavaScript6.3 ms0.5%
Running JavaScript (50%): the scripts responsible are listed right below. See Slowest JS functions · Timers
Style & layout (38%): usually a large DOM, expensive CSS selectors or JavaScript forcing synchronous layout. See Forced reflows · Forced layout per script · Slowest CSS selectors (Rendering tab) · Style invalidations (Rendering tab)

Top scripts blocking the main thread

3 of 3 scripts
load.php[startup]
802 ms · 7 tasks
Browser's own work (no script responsible)
510 ms · 3 tasks

Where the time went

All main-thread work during the full page load, not just the share that blocked input. Calculated from the Chrome trace.

Categories

3.552 s total
Running JavaScript1.427 s40.2%
Other browser work (scheduling)901 ms25.4%
Style & layout711 ms20.0%
Parsing HTML & CSS261 ms7.3%
Paint & composite199 ms5.6%
Parsing & compiling JavaScript37 ms1.0%
Garbage collection16 ms0.5%
What do these categories mean?
Parsing HTML & CSSparseHTML
Reading the HTML and CSS and building the page structure. Grows with document size — a big server-rendered page costs more here.
Style & layoutstyleLayout
Working out which CSS rules apply and where every element goes on the page. Grows with DOM size and selector complexity.
Parsing & compiling JavaScriptscriptParseCompile
Parsing and compiling JavaScript before it can run — the cost of shipping bytes of JS, even unused ones.
Running JavaScriptscriptEvaluation
Running JavaScript: event handlers, timers, promise callbacks and script execution.
Paint & compositepaintCompositeRender
Painting pixels and assembling layers into the frames you see on screen.
Garbage collectiongarbageCollection
Reclaiming memory JavaScript no longer uses. A lot of it means allocation-heavy code.
Other browser work (scheduling)other
Chrome’s own task management: per-task overhead and thousands of sub-millisecond scheduler ticks — not page work you can attribute or optimize away. On this page 893 ms of it is this per-task bookkeeping (RunTask self time in the trace).

CPU time per script

CPU time per moduleProfile run

Main-thread CPU time attributed to the individual modules inside concatenated JavaScript bundles (MediaWiki ResourceLoader), so a heavy bundle can be traced to the modules that actually cost the time.

The data comes from the extra profile run, not from the timed iterations.

ModuleVersionSelf time
jquery16rou165.1 ms
ext.wikimediaEvents1qtlt11.0 ms
mediawiki.storagednxpi6.9 ms
ext.centralNotice.startUp1ipzh5.2 ms
ext.navigationTiming18ja53.3 ms
ext.testKitchen1rj0w2.5 ms
(rest of the bundle, not tied to one module)144.6 ms

Slowest JS functions

The functions where main-thread JavaScript time was actually spent, sampled by Chrome's JavaScript profiler. Self time is spent in the function itself; total time includes the functions it called. For loader/dispatcher functions whose total dwarfs their self time, the runs line shows the top functions and modules (up to five, ≥ 1 ms) the total was actually spent running.

Functions by self time

15 of 50 functions
FunctionWhereSelf timeTotal time
flushWrites
runs: load.php[startup] (35.0 ms)
load.php[startup]209.8 ms245.8 ms
runScript
runs: load.php[scripts:ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLogger] (256.5 ms)
load.php[startup]104.4 ms576.4 ms
insertBeforeBrowser internal (not your code)97.1 ms97.1 ms
require
runs: load.php[scripts:ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLogger] (16.5 ms), load.php[startup] (4.0 ms)
load.php[startup]50.4 ms86.2 ms
impl
runs: load.php[startup] (2.6 ms), load.php[scripts:ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLogger] (3.4 ms)
load.php[startup]42.6 ms49.8 ms
setTimeoutBrowser internal (not your code)35.4 ms35.4 ms
doPropagation
runs: load.php[startup] (393.1 ms), load.php[scripts:ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLogger] (3.6 ms)
load.php[startup]26.8 ms423.4 ms
t
runs: load.php[scripts:ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLogger] (96.7 ms)
load.php[scripts:ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLogger]25.5 ms89.4 ms
set
runs: load.php[startup] (13.0 ms)
load.php[startup]22.1 ms35.0 ms
each
runs: load.php[scripts:ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLogger] (81.0 ms)
load.php[scripts:ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLogger]21.9 ms113.2 ms
find
runs: querySelectorAll (12.8 ms), load.php[scripts:ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLogger] (12.1 ms)
load.php[scripts:ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLogger]20.3 ms45.4 ms
appendChild
runs: (anonymous) (2.5 ms)
Browser internal (not your code)20.0 ms22.5 ms
(anonymous)load.php[scripts:ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLogger]16.5 ms16.5 ms
getUserViewportBucketload.php[scripts:ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLogger]15.0 ms15.0 ms
requestIdleCallbackBrowser internal (not your code)14.2 ms14.2 ms

TimersProfile run

How much setTimeout/setInterval work the page runs, credited to the script that scheduled each timer. Many zero-delay timers mean work sliced into a machine-gun of tiny tasks; repeating timers are polling.

Timers set55
Times fired53
Fire time188.9 ms
Zero-delay timers49
Repeating timers0
Zero-delay slicing: jquery split work into 47 back-to-back tasks costing 175 ms. Consider batching the work or moving it to requestIdleCallback or a worker.

Timer cost by script

2 scripts
load.php[scripts:ext.centralNotice.bannerHistoryLogger]
107 ms · set 53 times · fired 38 times
load.php[startup]
82 ms · set 2 times · fired 15 times

The timers, by where they were set

top 7 by fire time
Set byDelayTypeTimes setTimes firedFire time
jquery0 msonce4747175.1 ms
jquery0 msonce114.9 ms
SafeStorage in mediawiki.storage2000 msonce224.3 ms
ext.navigationTiming0 msonce113.3 ms
requestUpdate in load.php[startup]:222000 msonce221.3 ms
run in ext.wikimediaEvents60000 msonce100.0 ms
setActive in ext.wikimediaEvents100000 msonce100.0 ms

Forced reflows

A forced reflow happens when JavaScript reads a layout-triggering property (offsetTop, getBoundingClientRect, …) inside a handler, forcing the browser to synchronously recompute layout. The scripts below caused most of the page's reflows. Fix them in priority order.

Scripts causing reflows

2 reflows ≥ 2 ms across 1 script

Forced layout per script

Each long animation frame reports how much time each script spent forcing synchronous style and layout, i.e. JavaScript reading layout-triggering properties mid-execution. Same actionable answer as forced reflows above but measured directly by the browser instead of inferred from the trace.

Scripts forcing layout

1 of 1 script

First vs third party CPU time

Main-thread CPU time from the Chrome trace split by domain. First party is wikipedia.org.

First party1.397 s
Third party0 ms
Domains1

Non-composited animations

Animations that fell back from the compositor to the main thread, blocking each frame instead of running on the GPU.

Each chip below is a CSS property the page tried to animate that Chrome couldn't hand to the compositor. Swap it for a transform or opacity equivalent where you can.

Properties to fix

1 property · 3 animations
  • color

Want to dig deeper? Download the Chrome trace and drag-and-drop it into Performance in DevTools.